[citation][nom]hellscook[/nom]Let's not forget that Palin was in the wrong for using this address to conduct government business. I don't see her facing charges.[/citation]
I think that's the biggest point here, and no one (except you hellscook) seems to get it. She clearly violated law and policy regarding government/party related business on a personal email account. Is she being held accountable for this? Not even a slap on the wrist. Everyone seems to have conveniently forgotten about her role in all of this. Now, moving on to Kernell. Yes, he also violated policy and law. As stated, the positive revelations of his acts do not mitigate the criminal nature of them. He took it upon himself to act without authorization and should stand up and own his actions and accept responsibility for them. Probation and a fine, end of story. He did not steal her identity, nor did he fraudulently communicate through her account (both of which would have been MUCH more damaging to Palin, and damning to Kernell). Following a reasonable judgement against Kernell, what SHOULD happen (but won't) would be Palin put in the hot seat and expected to explain and be accountable for her own actions. Not only the obvious violation of government/party business in a personal space, but the idiocy displayed by leaving herself so vulnerable to intrusion. Anyone in these types of positions should be WELL informed about online security practices.