TheKurrgan
Distinguished
Well I can for one can believe easily Microsoft would cripple the used games. It makes a lot of sense for them to do so.
Used game sales don't generate a revenue stream for any one except whoever is selling the used game. However, gamestop has proven that there is a HUGE market for that sort of thing, not to mention gamefly and their rental system, which also only generates a one time revenue hit for the purchase of the games, the rest goes to gamefly for the rental.
I've only bought 6 new games since the release of the Xbox 360, but I own around 50.
Why do I and so many others probably have this skewed count of new vs used?
The answer is simple.. NEW GAMES ARENT WORTH THE PRICE THEY ARE SOLD FOR!!!
New games are out right anal rape, and I can't see shelling out that kind of cash for a game.
So as opposed to adjusting the cost of games to make the sales of new ones more attractive they will simply find a way to lock a game to a person, crippling both the used sales and rental of said game. They probably figure it'd create a little back lash for a bit, but in the end people would just bend over and take it in the tail pipe.
Sony / Nintendo would likely follow suite in this, however it may be a while.. I for one won't buy a 720 should this tactic be deployed, the 360 will have several years of life in it before the game flow dies out completely, and after that I'll either hang it up completely or find a console that doesn't have that anti-used measure in it.
As far as the Wii U having limited horse power...
Only twice as much as the 360 isn't bad, given the original Wii...I've never been a Wii fan, so I could personally care less.
Used game sales don't generate a revenue stream for any one except whoever is selling the used game. However, gamestop has proven that there is a HUGE market for that sort of thing, not to mention gamefly and their rental system, which also only generates a one time revenue hit for the purchase of the games, the rest goes to gamefly for the rental.
I've only bought 6 new games since the release of the Xbox 360, but I own around 50.
Why do I and so many others probably have this skewed count of new vs used?
The answer is simple.. NEW GAMES ARENT WORTH THE PRICE THEY ARE SOLD FOR!!!
New games are out right anal rape, and I can't see shelling out that kind of cash for a game.
So as opposed to adjusting the cost of games to make the sales of new ones more attractive they will simply find a way to lock a game to a person, crippling both the used sales and rental of said game. They probably figure it'd create a little back lash for a bit, but in the end people would just bend over and take it in the tail pipe.
Sony / Nintendo would likely follow suite in this, however it may be a while.. I for one won't buy a 720 should this tactic be deployed, the 360 will have several years of life in it before the game flow dies out completely, and after that I'll either hang it up completely or find a console that doesn't have that anti-used measure in it.
As far as the Wii U having limited horse power...
Only twice as much as the 360 isn't bad, given the original Wii...I've never been a Wii fan, so I could personally care less.